Trump Says His Super PAC Will Pay for Pro-Trump Ads Instead of Taxpayers

Dow Jones
Oct 06

President Trump said he plans to pay for controversial pro-Trump television ads using funds from his MAGA Inc. super PAC rather than the federal government, following lawmaker criticism that the spots might violate federal law and were an improper use of taxpayer money.

The advertisements, which predominantly feature the president and promote the administration's policies, started airing on national television last month and were paid for by federal funds from the Department of Homeland Security. Democrats and some Republicans questioned the use of federal dollars for the ad campaign, which the White House has defended as public service announcements.

"The Radical Left is upset with the fact that I am taking Ads, which I consider to be a positive promotion for our Great U.S.A., and paying for them with U.S.A. money," Trump posted on Truth Social Monday evening. "This is a rather standard thing to do but, rather than doing that, although nothing will make them happy, I have decided to do the Patriotic Ads, among others, and pay for them myself, and with money I raised for MAGA, Inc."

The White House said MAGA Inc. would pay for the ads moving forward. MAGA Inc. didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump personally pushed for the ads and has been involved in their creation, The Wall Street Journal has reported.

The ads have drawn public scrutiny because they include the unusual disclaimer "paid for by the U.S. government." Critics say the ads might violate laws including the Hatch Act, which prohibits executive-branch employees from using their jobs to promote political causes.

One of the ads begins with Trump saying a frequent line he uses on the campaign trail: "Together we will defeat communism, Marxism in America once and for all." The ad follows with dozens of images of the president at White House events. Playing in the background is a choir singing "Love Me." Trump ends by saying "America will never be a communist country" and in small letters at the bottom of the screen it reads, "Paid for by the U.S. government."

In a letter sent to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, top Democratic appropriators Sens. Patty Murray (D., Wash.) and Chris Murphy (D., Conn.) wrote that "using government funding to create or air political ads like the ones that have been running over the last few days is illegal and a shockingly corrupt misuse of taxpayer dollars."

Murray and Murphy wrote that it appeared DHS had dedicated $20 million to the ads, using funds provided to U.S. Customs and Border Protection from Republicans' tax and spending legislation last year, that were intended "for commemorative events relating to border security."

Some Republicans have also criticized the ads. On CBS News last month, Sen. John Kennedy (R., La.) said no public official, including Trump, "should spend public money on private ads for themselves."

Should Trump use MAGA Inc. funds, he will be dipping into a deep well of money. As of Aug. 31, MAGA Inc. had about $415.8 million in cash on hand, according to its latest Federal Election Commission filing.

The president has defended the ads from criticism that they were propaganda and might violate federal laws by saying he is not running for office.

"You have to understand I'm not promoting a candidate," Trump told reporters last week. "I'm not promoting myself because I'm not running for office. I'm promoting the country."

 

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10