American Women's 250-Year Journey from Coverture to a $30 Trillion Wealth Transfer

Dow Jones
Aug 21

The Declaration of Independence was formally signed this month 250 years ago. That milestone is an invitation to celebrate the values our nation's founders were striving for: That all people are created equal, have the right to pursue happiness, and have a voice in government.

In practice our founders extended those values only to white men, but the document nonetheless set a standard to strive for and created the impetus to fight for women's equality, including a woman's right to independently own and manage her wealth.

The battle for women's financial independence was neither quick nor easy. Achieving true equality for those a nation leaves out never is. But the progress we've made is worth celebrating, and the milestones along the way are worth remembering.

Coverture doctrine. During the United States' earliest days, women were technically allowed to participate in the economy. They could legally work and earn money, primarily in what were considered traditionally feminine careers, such as innkeepers and tavernkeepers. Single women were also allowed access to banking, although they made up a small percentage of customers due to social obstacles.

However, things changed when a woman married. Under a legal doctrine called coverture-imported to the colonies by the English-a wife's identity was considered legally merged with her husband's. She was "covered" by him and, in the eyes of the law, did not exist as an individual at all. Husband and wife were seen as one person, and that one was the husband.

Coverture made independence impossible for married women in many areas of life, particularly financial. A husband generally acquired control over his wife's earnings and much of the property she brought into the marriage. A married woman generally could not legally own property, sign contracts, or draft wills without her husband's consent.

Fortunately, coverture was mostly phased out over roughly four decades, beginning with Mississippi's Married Women's Property Act in 1839 and continuing through the 1880s as states enacted similar reforms.

Credit access. Although coverture was officially abolished in the 19th century, the struggle for women's financial independence was not over. Prior to 1974, financial institutions were allowed to deny women credit and loans based solely on sex or marital status.

When women applied, banks were legally allowed to ask questions about whether they were married and if they planned to use a male cosigner. Even when a woman earned her own income and was financially qualified to make payments, without a husband, father, brother, or another man to cosign for her, she could-and often was-denied access to credit. This applied not only to loans but to credit cards as well. Married women were only allowed to obtain credit cards in their husband's name, with a "Mrs." tacked to the front. This made it impossible for married women to build credit for themselves, even if they paid their own bills. If a woman divorced or her husband passed away, she was left with no credit history of her own and few avenues to pursue loans. In 1974, Congress passed the initial Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), a first attempt to make these practices illegal. In 1976, Congress strengthened the ECOA by broadening its protections. The amendments made it illegal for financial institutions to discriminate against credit and loan applicants based on race, color, religion, national origin, age, or receipt of public assistance as well as sex and marital status. They were mandated to approve applicants based only on their creditworthiness.

A long way. Of course, despite the passage of the ECOA, systemic issues persist. People of color and other protected groups still experience discrimination by financial institutions.

Women's wages are still on average lower than men's wages, and the gap is especially prominent for women of color. But the ECOA empowered women to pursue increased financial independence from men and allows all people to seek justice in the face of financial discrimination.

We've come a long way in the last 250 years in establishing greater financial independence for women. From the ECOA granting rights to credit to the 1988 Women's Business Ownership Act to the 2009 Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, and many more legal and social victories throughout the decades, we have made incredible progress. In fact, in 2024, 29% of C-suite executives were women compared with 17% a decade prior. Today, women of all racial and ethnic groups (in the 25-34 age range) are more likely than men to have bachelor's degrees.

It is also predicted that women will control $30 trillion of financial assets by 2030 as the primary beneficiaries of a massive wealth transfer from baby boomers.

The strides toward financial independence for women in this country were hard won. As we celebrate the anniversary of our nation's birth, we should also honor those who fought to make the ideals enshrined in the Declaration of Independence a reality. What better way to honor their legacy than to continue striving-and never give up until true financial freedom for all women has been achieved.

Kristi Mitchem is a founding partner of &Partners and former CEO of BMO Global Asset Management and Wells Fargo Asset Management, with more than 25 years of experience in asset management and capital markets. Her career has included leadership roles at State Street, BlackRock, and Goldman Sachs. Today, she is focused on building an institutional-quality investment platform that helps advisors and their clients thrive.

Editor's note: Guest commentaries like this one are written by authors outside the Barron's Advisor newsroom. They reflect the perspective and opinions of the authors. Submit feedback and commentary pitches to advisor.editors@barrons.com.

 

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10