Verisk Analytics (VRSK) Stock Looks Below Fair Value While Earnings Sit Above Fair Value

Simply Wall St.

Jul 19

Verisk Analytics stock has fallen 32.9% over the past year, yet the intrinsic value estimate from a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model points to meaningful upside, while traditional market multiples ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

{"basename":"","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - Tiger Brokers","title":"Tiger Brokers HK | Online Trading in stocks, bonds & ETFS","description":"Discover Tiger Brokers HK, an online trading platform for stocks&ETFs, options&futures, bonds and crypto. Open an account to enjoy low commission trading today!","keywords":"tiger trading,tiger security,tiger broker hk,tigers co ltd,tiger trade hk,tiger brokers hk,stock broker,securities broker,online brokerage,hong kong broker,hk broker,online stock trading,online trading platform,stock trading platforms,trading application,stock trading,stock trading hong kong,buying stocks in hong kong,tiger brokers","social":{"ogDescription":"Discover Tiger Brokers HK, an online trading platform for stocks&ETFs, options&futures, bonds and crypto. Open an account to enjoy low commission trading today!","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.0a0bd8dc.png","ogUrl":"https://www.gotigerhk.com/news/2652425841"},"companyName":"Tiger Brokers"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"HKG","license":"TBHK","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"2652425841\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2652425841?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://images.simplywall.st/asset/industry/9612012-choice1-main-header/1585186781062","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-07-19 03:21","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2652425841","market":"sg","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Verisk Analytics (VRSK) Stock Looks Below Fair Value While Earnings Sit Above Fair Value","media":"Simply Wall St.","content":"<div>\n<p>Verisk Analytics stock has fallen 32.9% over the past year, yet the intrinsic value estimate from a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model points to meaningful upside, while traditional market multiples ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/commercial-services/nasdaq-vrsk/verisk-analytics/news/verisk-analytics-vrsk-stock-looks-below-fair-value-while-ear\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"simplywall_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Verisk Analytics (VRSK) Stock Looks Below Fair Value While Earnings Sit Above Fair Value</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nVerisk Analytics (VRSK) Stock Looks Below Fair Value While Earnings Sit Above Fair Value\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-07-19 03:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/commercial-services/nasdaq-vrsk/verisk-analytics/news/verisk-analytics-vrsk-stock-looks-below-fair-value-while-ear><strong>Simply Wall St.</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Verisk Analytics stock has fallen 32.9% over the past year, yet the intrinsic value estimate from a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model points to meaningful upside, while traditional market multiples ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/commercial-services/nasdaq-vrsk/verisk-analytics/news/verisk-analytics-vrsk-stock-looks-below-fair-value-while-ear\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"VRSK","symbol_name":"Verisk Analytics","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/commercial-services/nasdaq-vrsk/verisk-analytics/news/verisk-analytics-vrsk-stock-looks-below-fair-value-while-ear","article_id":"2652425841","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://images.simplywall.st/asset/industry/9612012-choice1-main-header/1585186781062"],"rights":{"source":"simplywall_highlight","url":"https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/commercial-services/nasdaq-vrsk/verisk-analytics/news/verisk-analytics-vrsk-stock-looks-below-fair-value-while-ear","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2652425841","pubTimestamp":1784402484,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"simplywall_highlight","name":"Simply Wall St."},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Verisk Analytics stock has fallen 32.9% over the past year, yet the intrinsic value estimate from a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model points to meaningful upside, while traditional market multiples suggest the shares are expensive. This leaves investors with a clear split between valuation frameworks.\n\nOver the last 12 months, Verisk Analytics shares have declined 32.9%, which puts recent enthusiasm in context for anyone reassessing the stock's risk and reward trade off.\nThe company’s...","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"simplywall.st","property":["earning"],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"VRSK":"Verisk Analytics"},"translate_title":"Verisk Analytics (VRSK) 股票看起来低于公允价值，而盈利高于公允价值","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"VRSK":1.5},"content_text":"Verisk Analytics stock has fallen 32.9% over the past year, yet the intrinsic value estimate from a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model points to meaningful upside, while traditional market multiples suggest the shares are expensive. This leaves investors with a clear split between valuation frameworks.  Over the last 12 months, Verisk Analytics shares have declined 32.9%, which puts recent enthusiasm in context for anyone reassessing the stock's risk and reward trade off. The company’s recurring, data driven business model can support expectations for steady cash generation, but any pressure on client spending or contract renewals may weigh on how sustainable that cash flow profile looks. On Simply Wall St’s broader checks, Verisk Analytics scores 2 out of 6 on valuation, which leans more toward expensive territory than a clear bargain.  The issue now is whether investors should put more weight on the DCF indication of intrinsic value, which suggests Verisk Analytics is trading about 23.5% below that estimate, or on the richer signals coming from market multiples. Find out why Verisk Analytics' -32.9% return over the last year is lagging behind its peers. AdvertisementIs Verisk Analytics Still Cheap on Cash Flow? The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) approach here focuses on the cash Verisk Analytics can generate for shareholders over time. The model starts from latest twelve month free cash flow of about $1.1b and assumes that cash flows grow rather than contract over the coming years, consistent with a mature, recurring revenue business. On those assumptions, the DCF model points to an estimated intrinsic value of about $262 per share. With the current share price implying roughly a 23.5% discount to that figure, the market is pricing Verisk Analytics below what these projected cash flows would suggest, even after accounting for the usual uncertainty around long term forecasting. On this Discounted Cash Flow view, Verisk Analytics stock currently appears undervalued relative to its estimated intrinsic value. Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests Verisk Analytics is undervalued by 23.5%. Track this in your watchlist or portfolio, or discover 47 more high quality undervalued stocks. VRSK Discounted Cash Flow as at Jul 2026 Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for Verisk Analytics. Has Verisk Analytics Run Too Far on Earnings? The P/E ratio is a useful cross check for Verisk Analytics because earnings are a core focus for many investors comparing data and analytics stocks. Verisk Analytics currently trades on a P/E of 28.9x, which sits slightly above the peer average of 28.0x and clearly above the Professional Services industry average of 21.3x. That places the stock toward the higher end of what investors are currently paying for each dollar of earnings in this group. Simply Wall St’s model suggests a fair P/E of about 23.3x for Verisk Analytics, based on factors such as its sector, size and risk profile. Against that yardstick, the current 28.9x multiple implies investors are paying a premium to what this framework would typically expect. Even allowing for differences between individual companies, the gap indicates the stock screens as expensive on earnings. On the P/E multiple alone, Verisk Analytics stock appears overvalued relative to both tailored and broader market benchmarks. NasdaqGS:VRSK P/E Ratio as at Jul 2026 See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown. The Verisk Analytics Narrative: What Would Justify Today's Price? Simply Wall St Narratives for Verisk Analytics act as the link between the DCF and multiple based views above, and the specific future outcomes that would need to play out for the stock to be worth materially more or less than today's price, based on its growth, margins and earnings. Instead of stopping at a single valuation figure, they outline the future those numbers rely on so you can watch how Verisk Analytics' actual results line up over time. Community views on Verisk Analytics sit far apart, with one side seeing a reset opportunity and the other worried investors are overpaying for quality. Bull case: 9% undervalued \"Verisk is developing new platforms like the Enterprise Exposure Manager and Verisk Synergy Studio, which are expected to provide scalable and efficient risk assessment solutions...\" Read the full Bull Case to see why Verisk Analytics could be undervalued Bear case: 161% overvalued \"What the investor is paying for here is a regulatory annuity with an embedded MSD price-and-volume escalator, and walking away from any thesis premised on this becoming a HSD-to-DD revenue compounder...\" Read the full Bear Case to see why Verisk Analytics could be overvalued Do you think there's more to the story for Verisk Analytics? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying! The Bottom Line For Verisk Analytics, the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) view points to undervaluation, while the P/E based comparison flags the stock as overvalued relative to peers and a tailored fair multiple. Broader checks also lean weak, so the intrinsic value signal sits against a backdrop that does not suggest a clear bargain. The gap between the two methods comes down to whether you place more emphasis on the cash flow profile or on current market expectations embedded in earnings multiples. The key factor from here is how resilient Verisk Analytics' cash generation and client demand prove to be, and whether that ultimately supports today’s richer earnings multiple.  This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data\n        and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your\n        financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data.\n        Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.\n        Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One PlaceWe've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile• Track the Fair Value of your stocksTry a Demo Portfolio for FreeHave feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}